Studies
on the Canadian Constitution and Canadian Federalism
Last
revised: 19 February 2001 | Conventions
of the Constitution
Claude Bélanger,
Department of History, Marianopolis College Canada
has only a partly written constitution. There exist, however, many practices which
are adhered to in Canada which are not included in the Constitution Act or any
other formal constitutional document. These practices are called conventions of
the Constitution and are made up of accepted procedures and well recognized practices
that are binding on those to whom they are meant to apply. For the most part,
conventions of the constitution apply to politicians. Such conventions of the
Constitution include, among others, the role of the Cabinet, the post of the Prime
Minister, the existence of political parties, the principles of responsible government
and cabinet solidarity, the status of the Governor General etc. Conventions of
the Constitution, since they are not formally set down in a written formal document,
are rarely, if ever, legally enforceable. They rest on their acceptability to
the people as a whole. Presumably, if a convention was violated it would lead
to such unrest that the ultimate consequence would the enactment of a formal law
to prevent its recurrence. For a convention
of the constitution to exist some important criteria must be established: 1. the
participants must feel bound by it; it must not be a matter of choice for them.
2. there must be precedents for it (at least one). 3. There must be a reason for
this convention and this reason must continue to exist. The
last time that conventions of the constitution were raised in Canada was in the
period of 1980-1982 when Pierre Trudeau proposed to patriate and amend the Canadian
constitution without the support of the provinces. The Supreme Court of Canada
held that while Trudeau was not acting illegally, nevertheless he proposed to
act unconstitutionally when one considers the conventions of the Constitution.
As expected, in this case, Trudeau sat down with the provinces to obtain a satisfactory
level of support and, thus, showed respect for the Constitution of Canada. ©
2001 Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College |